Hypergamy? Or Perhaps Not, Whining Man-babe in Arms
Thaddeus couldn’t be bothered to respond to you and requested that I handle his light work because he felt he couldn’t speak to you in a civil tone. I am his Spokes-Cat who handles those calls which enrage him so much, his normally eloquent discourse becomes impossible in the light of your inanity.
I am, however, not pleased to make your acquaintance. And let it be known, we will not be having a discussion. You have proven you lack the ability to string together even a single cogent and meaningful thought, so we will consider this an intervention, not a conversation.
Since your account appears to exist solely for the purpose of harassing others, I have decided you deserve no courtesy whatsoever and I suggested he simply delete and block your sorry ass but he refused to be reasonable in the face of your pitiful attempt at relevancy, judging by your attempt to latch onto an article which refutes your very existence.
Without Further Ado:
The next time you want to argue, you Russian wanna-be Matryoshka doll troll, who created this account just to refute something you disagree with but don’t have the decency to have written anything meaningful before this moment, remember to actually bring some ammunition to your argument. Normally, I would teach you HOW to make an argument, but I can’t be bothered with you, I have real work to be accomplished. Instead, I refer you to this handy guide:
The hierarchy of disagreement: The best and worst argument techniques
Many find themselves arguing with someone on the Internet, especially in these days fraught with political tensions. A…
You appear to be the lazy dilettante so common to the conservative, whining, racist, mens-rights activist movement intent on telling the world about how men don’t have enough rights. You can’t be bothered to structure an argument that doesn’t depend upon your rhetorical arguments about the fall of society and the necessity of White men to remain at the top of the economic and social heap, because.
It’s never quite clear why you think this. Given the state of the world today, you actually make the case as to sending all White men (hell, let’s be truly frank) ANY MEN who are in positions of power, whose history does not show itself to be directed toward improving humanity in any way, to a cool, dimly-lit gulag in Siberia for an extended vacation stay while they relearn what it means to be Human.
What you did doesn’t deserve the dissection and vivisection I normally reserve for lazy man-trolls wanna-be rights activists who want to talk about the victimization of men, when men control most of the money, resources, opportunities, and control of HUMAN SOCIETY as a whole. Just because.
It is hard for me to listen to you complain when you want to say women are emasculating you when you are writing such whiny drivel. You don’t even have the capacity to recognize just how pitiful you sound. But I have spent too many words on you already.
Here is a chart to help you define exactly how to pose an argument which will not have people shaking their heads at the pitiful nature of your debating skills and wondering if you are still in your mother’s basement when you created your meandering and meaningless man-splaining rhetorical trashfire you called an argument. See what I did there?
Just so we are clear: There is no such meaningful world-view which can place women in control of the overall fate and opportunities of men, such as your statement of hypergamy might suggest. Any such suggestion is refuted on the evidence of women’s status in almost every society on the planet. Even in more enlightened ones, we can still find room for improvement.
There. I have refuted the central point of your argument. If you feel compelled to write a response, please bring your argument of refutation by starting with significant instances of women controlling society in such a way that it prevents men from having opportunity.
Remember, any further specious (meaningless, without content or significance) communication between you and my client will be summarily destroyed as we are both opposed to the imprisonment of good electrons who have done nothing wrong and don’t deserve to be trapped as part of one of your prison missives of spewing hatred and redundant man-whining.
Not Sincerely Yours,
Felis Silvestris Sinister, Esq.
If you have survived this and read to the end (assuming you are able) know that you are not alone. There are many people just like you, unaware of themselves and how annoying they are. This attached letter might also help you become a better person. I doubt it, but my client thought it would be helpful to you. Personally, I don’t give a damn. You haven’t earned such courtesy.
Felis Silvestris Sinister, Esq. is a spoke-cat known for speaking truth to power, and is completely intolerant of people who believe they should use the Internet to promote hatred and division among it users.
Felis does not communicate often with Humans, finding them contradictory and unpleasant but can be convinced to engage them from time to time with the proper applications of legal briefs and his favorite cat-snacks — the balls of weak men who complain online how rough their lives are when they have every opportunity to shine if they worked harder and whined less.
Felis graduated at the top of his class and continues his work eviscerating assholes wherever he is needed.